Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743778›Full record

ArticleScientometrics2023

An embedding approach for analyzing the evolution of research topics with a case study on computer science subdomains.

Seyyed Reza Taher Harikandeh, Sadegh Aliakbary, Soroush Taheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seyyed Reza Taher HarikandehFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Sadegh AliakbaryFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-1136
Soroush TaheriFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of topic evolution aims to analyze the behavior of different research fields by utilizing various features such as the relationships between articles. In recent years, many published papers consider more than one field of study which has led to a significant increase in the number of inter-field and interdisciplinary articles. Therefore, we can analyze the similarity/dissimilarity and convergence/divergence of research fields based on topic analysis of the published papers. Our research intends to create a methodology for studying the evolution of the research fields. In this paper, we propose an embedding approach for modeling each research topics as a multidimensional vector. Using this model, we measure the topic's distances over the years and investigate how topics evolve over time. The proposed similarity metric showed many advantages over other alternatives (such as Jaccard similarity) and it resulted in better stability and accuracy. As a case study, we applied the proposed method to subsets of computer science for experimental purposes, and the results were quite comprehensible and coherent.

Indexed as

Data miningInformetricsScientometricsSimilarity metricsTopic embeddingTopic evolution

Identifiers

PMID36743778
PMCPMC9886542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.