ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2023
A segmentation-informed deep learning framework to register dynamic two-dimensional magnetic resonance images of the vocal tract during speech.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation of Pediatric Vocal Tract Anatomy in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- PRORED: a hybrid transformer framework with progressive refinement decoding for segmenting dynamic speech MRI.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Real-time speech MRI datasets with corresponding articulator ground-truth segmentations.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enables visualisation of articulators during speech. There is growing interest in quantifying articulator motion in two-dimensional MR images of the vocal tract, to better understand speech production and potentially inform patient management decisions. Image registration is an established way to achieve this quantification. Recently, segmentation-informed deformable registration frameworks have been developed and have achieved state-of-the-art accuracy. This work aims to adapt such a framework and optimise it for estimating displacement fields between dynamic two-dimensional MR images of the vocal tract during speech. Methods: A deep-learning-based registration framework was developed and compared with current state-of-the-art registration methods and frameworks (two traditional methods and three deep-learning-based frameworks, two of which are segmentation informed). The accuracy of the methods and frameworks was evaluated using the Dice coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD) and a metric based on velopharyngeal closure. The metric evaluated if the fields captured a clinically relevant and quantifiable aspect of articulator motion. Results: The segmentation-informed frameworks achieved higher DSCs and lower ASDs and captured more velopharyngeal closures than the traditional methods and the framework that was not segmentation informed. All segmentation-informed frameworks achieved similar DSCs and ASDs. However, the proposed framework captured the most velopharyngeal closures. Conclusions: A framework was successfully developed and found to more accurately estimate articulator motion than five current state-of-the-art methods and frameworks. Significance: The first deep-learning-based framework specifically for registering dynamic two-dimensional MR images of the vocal tract during speech has been developed and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.