Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743672›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Study on MEV90 of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided caudal epidural block in anorectal surgery.

Pei Zhang, Hong Chang, Taoran Yang, Yalong Fu, Xuemei He, Jun Li, Mingan Yang, Rurong Wang, Xuehan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block by Costoclavicular Space Approach: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pei ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hong ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Taoran YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yalong FuDepartment of Anus Intestine, Karamay People's Hospital, Xinjiang, China.
Xuemei HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mingan YangDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Rurong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xuehan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sichuan University · CNKaramay Central Hospital · CNSan Diego State University · USWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Choosing the appropriate concentration and volume of anesthetics is critical for a successful nerve block. The current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided CEB in 90% of patients (MEV90) undergoing anorectal surgery. The aims were to reduce the occurrence of complications associated with a sacral blockade in anorectal surgery, broaden the indications for surgical procedures and treatment, and improve patient satisfaction. This study presents the groundwork for the development of individualized anesthetic programs. We believe that the study would serve as a reference for the use of caudal epidural block (CEB) in lower abdominal surgery for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Methods: This study used a biased coin design (BCD) up-and-down method (UDM). We divided the participants into two groups based on gender, and each group independently performed the biased coin design up-and-down method. We used 0.5% ropivacaine for the first patient in each group; however, the volume was 10 ml for men and 8 ml for women. Therefore, the dose of anesthetics given to each patient was determined by the response of the previous patient. If the block of the previous patient failed, the volume was increased by 2 ml in the following patient. Otherwise, the next subject had an 11% chance of receiving a volume of 2 ml less or an 89% chance of receiving no volume change. We defined a successful block as painless surgery with anal sphincter relaxation 15 min after the drug injection. Enrollment was completed after 45 successful caudal blocks for each group. Results: Caudal epidural block was successfully performed on 50 men and 49 women. The MEV90 of ropivacaine for CEB was calculated to be 12.88 ml (95% CI: 10.8-14 ml) for men and 10.73 ml (95% CI: 9.67-12 ml) for women. Men had a MEV99 of 13.88 ml (95% CI: 12.97-14 ml), and women had a MEV99 of 11.87 ml (95% CI: 11.72-12 ml). Conclusion: With operability and general applicability, it is possible to increase the success rate of CEB for anorectal surgery to 99% as well as decrease the incidence of anesthesia-related complications. CEB can meet the needs of patients for rapid postoperative rehabilitation, improve patient satisfaction, and lay a solid foundation for postoperative analgesia.

Indexed as

anorectal surgerycaudal blockminimum effective volumeropivacaineultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36743672
PMCPMC9892538
OpenAlexW4317387939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.