Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743537›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Interaction between bacterial endophytes and host plants.

Sehrish Mushtaq, Muhammad Shafiq, Muhammad Rizwan Tariq, Adnan Sami, Muhammad Shah Nawaz-Ul-Rehman, Muhammad Hamza Tariq Bhatti, Muhammad Saleem Haider, Saleha Sadiq, Muhammad Taqqi Abbas, Mujahid Hussain and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sehrish MushtaqFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShafiqDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rizwan TariqDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Adnan SamiDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shah Nawaz-Ul-RehmanVirology Lab, Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of Agriculture Faisalabad Pakistan, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hamza Tariq BhattiFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Saleem HaiderFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Saleha SadiqInstitute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology, and Bioinformatics (IBBB), The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Muhammad Taqqi AbbasDepartment of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mujahid HussainHorticultural Science Department, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, Quincy, FL, United States.
Muhammad Adnan ShahidHorticultural Science Department, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, Quincy, FL, United States.
University of the Punjab · PKUniversity of Florida · USIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic bacteria are mainly present in the plant's root systems. Endophytic bacteria improve plant health and are sometimes necessary to fight against adverse conditions. There is an increasing trend for the use of bacterial endophytes as bio-fertilizers. However, new challenges are also arising regarding the management of these newly discovered bacterial endophytes. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes exist in a wide host range as part of their microbiome, and are proven to exhibit positive effects on plant growth. Endophytic bacterial communities within plant hosts are dynamic and affected by abiotic/biotic factors such as soil conditions, geographical distribution, climate, plant species, and plant-microbe interaction at a large scale. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate the mechanism of bacterial endophytes' interaction with plants under field conditions before their application. Bacterial endophytes have both beneficial and harmful impacts on plants but the exact mechanism of interaction is poorly understood. A basic approach to exploit the potential genetic elements involved in an endophytic lifestyle is to compare the genomes of rhizospheric plant growth-promoting bacteria with endophytic bacteria. In this mini-review, we will be focused to characterize the genetic diversity and dynamics of endophyte interaction in different host plants.

Indexed as

bacterial endophytesendophytichost endosymbiont interactionsmechanism of interactionplants

Identifiers

PMID36743537
PMCPMC9890182
OpenAlexW4317106301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.