Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Heat stress decreased transpiration but increased evapotranspiration in gerbera.

Zaiqiang Yang, Yuhan Jiang, Rangjian Qiu, Xuewen Gong, Evgenios Agathokleous, Wei Hu, Brent Clothier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physiological Response ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mitigation of High Temperatures withPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zaiqiang YangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Yuhan JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Rangjian QiuState Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, School of Water Resources and Hyperpower Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xuewen GongSchool of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Henan Key Laboratory of Crop Water Use, Zhengzhou, China.
Evgenios AgathokleousJiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Wei HuThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Brent ClothierThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology · CNPlant & Food Research · NZNorth China University of Water Resources and Electric Power · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat stress is a major constraint for plant production, and evapotranspiration is highly linked to plant production. However, the response mechanism of evapotranspiration to heat stress remains unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of heat stress during two main growth stages on transpiration and evapotranspiration of gerbera. Two levels of day/night temperature were adopted during the vegetative growth stage (VG) and the flowering bud differentiation stage (FBD), namely control (CK; 28/18 °C) and heat stress (HS; 38/28°C) levels. The duration of HS was set as 5, 10, 15, and 20 days, respectively. At the beginning of HS, hourly transpiration was mainly inhibited near noon. With continuation of HS, the duration and extent of inhibition of hourly transpiration increased. Daily transpiration rate was also markedly reduced by HS during the VG (18.9%-31.8%) and FBD (12.1%-20.3%) stages compared to CK. The decrease in the daily transpiration rate was greater for longer duration of heat stress. This reduction of transpiration was the main contributor to stomatal limitation at the beginning of HS, while additional inhibition of root activity, leaf area, and root biomass occurred under long-term HS. The daily transpiration rate could not recover after the end of HS (so-called recovery phase), except when HS lasted 5 days during the VG stage. Interestingly, daily evapotranspiration during HS was substantially increased during the VG (12.6%-24.5%) and FBD (8.4%-17.6%) stages as a result of more increased evaporation (100%-115%) than reduced transpiration. However, during the recovery phase, the daily evapotranspiration was markedly decreased at the VG (11.2%-22.7%) and FBD (11.1%-19.2%) stages. Hence, we suggest that disproportionate variation of transpiration and evaporation during HS, especially at the recovery phase, should be considered in various evapotranspiration models and climate scenarios projections.

Indexed as

evaporationhigh temperatureleaf stomataroot activitystomatal conductancetranspiration

Identifiers

PMID36743492
PMCPMC9892838
OpenAlexW4317510972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.