Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743488›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Digitalizing breeding in plants: A new trend of next-generation breeding based on genomic prediction.

Donghyun Jeon, Yuna Kang, Solji Lee, Sehyun Choi, Yeonjun Sung, Tae-Ho Lee, Changsoo Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donghyun JeonPlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Science in Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yuna KangPlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Solji LeePlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sehyun ChoiPlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yeonjun SungPlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Science in Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Ho LeeGenomics Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Changsoo KimPlant Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Science in Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Chungnam National University · KRNational Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the world's population grows and food needs diversification, the demand for cereals and horticultural crops with beneficial traits increases. In order to meet a variety of demands, suitable cultivars and innovative breeding methods need to be developed. Breeding methods have changed over time following the advance of genetics. With the advent of new sequencing technology in the early 21st century, predictive breeding, such as genomic selection (GS), emerged when large-scale genomic information became available. GS shows good predictive ability for the selection of individuals with traits of interest even for quantitative traits by using various types of the whole genome-scanning markers, breaking away from the limitations of marker-assisted selection (MAS). In the current review, we briefly describe the history of breeding techniques, each breeding method, various statistical models applied to GS and methods to increase the GS efficiency. Consequently, we intend to propose and define the term digital breeding through this review article. Digital breeding is to develop a predictive breeding methods such as GS at a higher level, aiming to minimize human intervention by automatically proceeding breeding design, propagating breeding populations, and to make selections in consideration of various environments, climates, and topography during the breeding process. We also classified the phases of digital breeding based on the technologies and methods applied to each phase. This review paper will provide an understanding and a direction for the final evolution of plant breeding in the future.

Indexed as

AI breedingdeep learninggenomic predictionGWAShigh throughput phenotypingmachine learningMASQTLs

Identifiers

PMID36743488
PMCPMC9892199
OpenAlexW4317388067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.