ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2023
Imaging Classification of Constipation.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The diagnosis of patients with chronic constipation is very complicated. This study aimed to develop a simple imaging classification for the diagnosis of chronic constipation by abdominal computed tomography (CT). Methods: Sixty-two patients who underwent abdominal CT in our hospital between January and June 2022 were enrolled. The CT values of the stool in the rectum and cecum were measured in patients with chronic constipation (C group) and in those without (non-C group). Results: A strong correlation was observed between the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and the CT value of rectal stool. Furthermore, the rectal stool CT value was significantly higher in patients with chronic constipation than in those without. The CT value of cecal stool did not differ between the two groups. The cecal stool CT value was significantly higher in patients with severe constipation (BSFS 1) than in those with BSFS 2-6. A cutoff CT value of 100 was selected as the optimal value for indicating chronic constipation. Conclusions: Abdominal CT was useful in the diagnosis of chronic constipation. If the patient had constipation, the optimal cutoff CT value was 100.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.