Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743424›Full record

ArticleKidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)2022

Extended disease control with unconventional cabozantinib dose increase in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Akanksha Sharma, Roy Elias, Alana Christie, Noelle S Williams, Ivan Pedrosa, Georg A Bjarnason, James Brugarolas

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akanksha SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), Dallas, TX.
Roy EliasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), Dallas, TX.
Alana ChristieKidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Noelle S WilliamsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Ivan PedrosaKidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Georg A BjarnasonSunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (SOCC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James BrugarolasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW), Dallas, TX.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center SPORE in Kidney CancerP50CA196516 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Brugarolas · 2016 to 2026
$24.7M
Dissecting the mechanism of cabozantinib anti-tumor effect in renal cancerR21CA263264 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRUGAROLAS, JAMES · 2021 to 2022
$417k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196516NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cabozantinib is among the most potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) FDA-approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Effective treatments after progression on cabozantinib salvage therapy are limited. Dose escalation for other TKIs has been shown to afford added disease control. Objective: We sought to evaluate whether dose escalation of cabozantinib (Cabometyx Methods: We identified patients with mRCC at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center who were treated with cabozantinib dose escalation to 80 mg after progressing on conventional cabozantinib 60 mg. We then queried leading kidney cancer investigators across the world to identify additional patients. Finally, we reviewed pharmacokinetic (PK) data to assess how higher doses impacted circulating levels by comparison to other formulations (Cometriq Results: We report six patients treated at two different institutions with cabozantinib-responsive disease and good tolerability, where cabozantinib was dose escalated (typically to 80 mg, but as high as 120 mg) after progression on 60 mg, a strategy that resulted in added disease control (median duration, 14 months; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 8 - Not Estimable[NE]). Four patients (66.7%) had disease control lasting at least 1 year. No grade III/IV adverse events were identified in this small, select, cohort. A comparison of PK data to FDA-approved cabozantinib 140 mg capsules suggest that cabozantinib 80 mg tablets results in comparable exposures. Conclusions: mRCC patients with cabozantinib responsive disease and reasonable tolerability may benefit from dose escalation at progression.

Indexed as

acquired resistanceCABOMETYX®cabozantinibCOMETRIQ®Kidney cancerpharmacokineticssalvage therapyTKItoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36743424
PMCPMC9894028
OpenAlexW4200092447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.