Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743325›Full record

ArticleUrology case reports2023

Inflatable penile prosthesis placement after prior transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement: A case report.

Leah Ashton, Brad Erickson, Amy Pearlman

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah AshtonUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, United States.
Brad EricksonUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, United States.
Amy PearlmanUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, United States.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction often coexist in men surgically treated for prostate cancer. Despite many men having both an artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis to treat these conditions, there is limited information in the literature to guide surgeons when it comes to placing both devices. We recommend obtaining direct exposure of proximal crura to allow for complete dilation of corporal spaces for proper prosthetic placement. Further dissection via penoscrotal incision or perineal counter-incision can be utilized. Surgeons should consider dorsal lithotomy position at time of IPP placement to allow for perineal exposure.

Indexed as

Artificial urinary sphincterAUS, artificial urinary sphincterCase reportInflatable penile prosthesisIPP, inflatable penile prosthesisProstatectomy complicationsRTE, rear tip extendersSUI, stress urinary incontinenceTranscorporal AUS

Identifiers

PMID36743325
PMCPMC9895961
OpenAlexW4313529778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.