Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743303›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Leveraging 16S rRNA data to uncover vaginal microbial signatures in women with cervical cancer.

Ming Wu, Hongfei Yu, Yueqian Gao, Huanrong Li, Chen Wang, Huiyang Li, Xiaotong Ma, Mengting Dong, Bijun Li, Junyi Bai and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ming WuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hongfei YuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yueqian GaoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Huanrong LiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Huiyang LiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaotong MaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Mengting DongDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bijun LiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Junyi BaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yalan DongDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiangqin FanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jintian ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ye YanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wenhui QiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Cha HanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Aiping FanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Fengxia XueDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiota-relevant signatures have been investigated for human papillomavirus-related cervical cancer (CC), but lack consistency because of study- and methodology-derived heterogeneities. Here, four publicly available 16S rRNA datasets including 171 vaginal samples (51 CC versus 120 healthy controls) were analyzed to characterize reproducible CC-associated microbial signatures. We employed a recently published clustering approach called VAginaL community state typE Nearest CentroId clAssifier to assign the metadata to 13 community state types (CSTs) in our study. Nine subCSTs were identified. A random forest model (RFM) classifier was constructed to identify 33 optimal genus-based and 94 species-based signatures. Confounder analysis revealed confounding effects on both study- and hypervariable region-associated aspects. After adjusting for confounders, multivariate analysis identified 14 significantly changed taxa in CC versus the controls (

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAbiomarkerscervical cancerHPVvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID36743303
PMCPMC9892946
OpenAlexW4317402168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.