Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743267›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2023

A review of semi-supervised learning for text classification.

José Marcio Duarte, Lilian Berton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José Marcio DuarteScience and Technology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, Cesare Mansueto Giulio Lattes Ave, 1201, São José dos Campos, SP 12247-014 Brazil.
Lilian BertonScience and Technology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, Cesare Mansueto Giulio Lattes Ave, 1201, São José dos Campos, SP 12247-014 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A huge amount of data is generated daily leading to big data challenges. One of them is related to text mining, especially text classification. To perform this task we usually need a large set of labeled data that can be expensive, time-consuming, or difficult to be obtained. Considering this scenario semi-supervised learning (SSL), the branch of machine learning concerned with using labeled and unlabeled data has expanded in volume and scope. Since no recent survey exists to overview how SSL has been used in text classification, we aim to fill this gap and present an up-to-date review of SSL for text classification. We retrieve 1794 works from the last 5 years from IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Science Direct, and Springer. Then, 157 articles were selected to be included in this review. We present the application domain, datasets, and languages employed in the works. The text representations and machine learning algorithms. We also summarize and organize the works following a recent taxonomy of SSL. We analyze the percentage of labeled data used, the evaluation metrics, and obtained results. Lastly, we present some limitations and future trends in the area. We aim to provide researchers and practitioners with an outline of the area as well as useful information for their current research.

Indexed as

Machine learningNatural language processingSemi-supervised learningText classification

Identifiers

PMID36743267
PMCPMC9887265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.