Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Social prescription in the US: A pilot evaluation of Mass Cultural Council's "CultureRx".

Tasha L Golden, Alyson Maier Lokuta, Aanchal Mohanty, Alyssa Tiedemann, T W Cherry Ng, Maanasa Mendu, Nicole Morgan, Maria Nagae Kuge, Tessa Brinza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tasha L GoldenInternational Arts and Mind Lab, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alyson Maier LokutaCenter for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Aanchal MohantyInternational Arts and Mind Lab, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alyssa TiedemannInternational Arts and Mind Lab, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
T W Cherry NgInternational Arts and Mind Lab, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Maanasa MenduHarvard College, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Nicole MorganCenter for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Maria Nagae KugeCenter for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Tessa BrinzaCenter for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As the field of public health strives to address the impacts of social determinants of health, it has seen increasing interest in community-referral practices that expand health care beyond clinical spaces. However, community arts and culture organizations are rarely included in these practices, despite accumulating evidence of associated health benefits. In addition, such inclusion has not been formally studied. In response, this article offers an evaluation of "CultureRx" in Massachusetts (MA): the first US model of arts on prescription. The program is a partnership between 20 healthcare providers and 12 cultural organizations, in which providers can offer "prescriptions" to cultural experiences to support patients' health. Methods: Evaluation was undertaken to illuminate participant experiences, program successes and barriers, and recommendations for further development. The cultural organizations collected participant data ( Results: Findings indicate that participants enjoyed and hoped to repeat their prescribed experiences, which they saw as beneficial to wellbeing. Providers identified the program as a new and critical addition to their toolkits; they also indicated it had a positive effect on their own wellbeing. Cultural organizations reported varied challenges, learnings, and recommendations. Conclusion: The CultureRx pilot suggests that integrating arts/culture assets into health and social care approaches can enrich and improve traditional US models of community referral. By including arts/culture resources when addressing social determinants of health, communities will be better positioned to equitably and holistically advance health.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareSocial SupportFocus GroupsHumansMassachusettsPilot Projectsarts and healthcommunity referralshealth carepublic healthsocial caresocial determinantssocial prescriptionwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID36743160
PMCPMC9892638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.