ReviewArchive of applied mechanics = Ingenieur-Archiv2023
A review on non-Newtonian fluid models for multi-layered blood rheology in constricted arteries.
Review in Archive of applied mechanics = Ingenieur-Archiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study of Coronary Stent Thrombosis Growth.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparing Nanomechanical Properties and Membrane Roughness Along the Aging of Human Erythrocytes.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of blood models in predicting rupture status of intracranial aneurysms.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Article
- Instability of Oldroyd-B Liquid Films with Odd Viscosity on Porous Inclined Substrates.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantitative and qualitative investigation of shunt failure in anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Temperature-dependent yield stress and wall slip behaviour of thermoresponsive Pluronic F127 hydrogels.RSC advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemodynamics is a branch of fluid mechanics which investigates the features of blood when it flows not only via blood vessels of smaller/larger diameter, but also under normal as well as abnormal flow states, such as in the presence of stenosis, aneurysm, and thrombosis. This review aims to discuss the rheological properties of blood, geometry of constrictions, dilations and the emergence of single-layered fluid to four-layered fluid models. To discuss further the influence of the aforesaid parameters on the physiologically important flow quantities, the mathematical formulation and solution methodology of the two-layered and four layered arterial blood flow problems studied by the authors (Afiqah and Sankar in ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 15:1129--1143, 2020, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 199:105907, 2021. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105907) are recalled. It should be pointed out that the increasing resistive impedance to flow in three distinct states encompassing healthy, anaemic, and diabetic demonstrates that the greater the restriction in the artery, very few blood is carried to the pathetic organs, leading to subjects' death. It is also discovered that the pulsatile nature of blood movement produces a dynamic environment that poses a slew of intriguing and unstable fluid mechanical state. It is hoped that the intriguing results gathered from this literature survey and review conducted may help the medical practitioners to forecast blood behaviour mobility in stenotic arteries. Furthermore, the physiological information gathered from the available clinical data from the literature on patients diagnosed with diabetes and anaemia may be beneficial to doctors in deciding the therapeutic procedure for treating some particular cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.