Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36743071›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Spheroid Engineering in Microfluidic Devices.

Atakan Tevlek, Seren Kecili, Ozge S Ozcelik, Haluk Kulah, H Cumhur Tekin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atakan TevlekMETU MEMS Research and Application Center, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-8642
Seren KeciliThe Department of Bioengineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3049-9466
Ozge S OzcelikThe Department of Bioengineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir 35430, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8359-5270
Haluk KulahMETU MEMS Research and Application Center, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1331-4474
H Cumhur TekinMETU MEMS Research and Application Center, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5758-5439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture techniques are commonly employed to investigate biophysical and biochemical cellular responses. However, these culture methods, having monolayer cells, lack cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions, mimicking the cell microenvironment and multicellular organization. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture methods enable equal transportation of nutrients, gas, and growth factors among cells and their microenvironment. Therefore, 3D cultures show similar cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation properties to

Identifiers

PMID36743071
PMCPMC9893254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.