ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Development and Validation of Scale Assessing the Preparedness of Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Undergraduate Competency based Medical Education.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Formative assessments methods such as objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) are reliable and valid assessment tools employed under the competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. However, there was no uniform scale to assess the attributes of OSCE for any of the medical subjects. Hence, this study was done to develop and validate a scale to assess the attributes of OSCE and make sure that the intended objectives of the OSCE are achieved. Methods: The scale was developed using literature review and expert opinion. It consisted of 10 questions and response to these items was based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from Results: Two-factor structures were obtained with eigenvalues of 4.32 and 1.90. Factor 1 consisted of seven items (positively faced questions) accounting for 42.84% of the variance, whereas Factor 2 had the remaining three items (negatively faced questions) explaining 19.36% of the variance. Thus, together, the two factors explained 62.20% of the variance. Goodness-of-fit indices revealed good Comparative fit index (CFI) s of 0.90, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) of 0.87, and acceptable Standardized Root Mean Square Residua (SRMR) of 0.13. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the scale was 0.81. Conclusion: This study develops and validates a scale that can be used universally for assessing the attributes of OSCE across all disciplines and in medical education institutes in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.