Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742813›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022

Impact of Noise on Sound Processing at Lower Auditory System: An Electrophysiological Study.

Udit Saxena, Bhanu Shukla, Rajesh Tripathy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Udit SaxenaDepartment of ENT, GMERS Medical College, Sola, Ahmedabad India.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-7015
Bhanu ShuklaSchool of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN USA.
Rajesh TripathyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INB.J. Medical College · INUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is well documented in behavioral speech perception experiments and psychophysical measurements. Studies on ABR related to the encoding of signals in ipsilateral noise are very limited. The present study aimed to systematically investigate the effect of various SNRs on the latency and amplitude of ABR to a range of stimuli & to compare the latency and amplitude of ABR recorded in various ipsilateral SNRs in children and adults. We recorded auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in children and young adults for clicks, a speech token /da/ of 40 ms duration, and for a 1000 Hz tone burst in the presence of a broad band noise and quiet. There were four SNR conditions (+ 10 dB SNR, 0 dB SNR and -10 dB SNR), and the level of noise was varied, while the stimulus level was fixed at 60 dB HL. The results showed that SNR affects the latency and amplitude of the wave V peak differentially for the different stimuli. A difference in the performance of children and adults was also observed. SNR measurements using ABR provide an objective index of brainstem ability to process sound in the presence of background noise. This measure is important and can be used to assess the sound-in-noise processing ability in the difficult-to-test population such as infants and children where measures of signal-to-noise tests cannot be administered.

Indexed as

ABREffect of background noiseElectrophysiological evaluationSNR

Identifiers

PMID36742813
PMCPMC9895159
OpenAlexW3200498006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.