ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022
Systematic Review of Comparison of use of Ultrasonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Haemostatic Techniques in Performing Thyroid Surgery.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of high-energy devices for thyroid surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Conventional clamp-and-tie hemostasis versus energy-based hemostasis devices in total thyroidectomy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Perioperative Patient Blood Management: Evidence-Based Strategies for Surgeons and Anesthesiologists: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound and Nanomedicine for Cancer-Targeted Drug Delivery: Screening, Cellular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- New Medical Device and Therapeutic Approvals in Otolaryngology: State of the Art Review of 2022.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemostasis during any surgical procedure is fundamental for attaining a positive patient outcome. Safe thyroid surgery requires meticulous attention for careful control of bleeding and safe guarding important structures like recurrent laryngeal nerve. Many methods such as ligation and suturing, electro ligation sealing, coagulation, and ultrasonic coagulation have been put to use for achieving haemostasis. The objective of this systemic review was to compare and review the surgical outcomes between harmonic (ultrasonic) scalpel and conventional ligature techniques in performing thyroid surgery. The systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement and checklist with a total of 11 studies selected for qualitative analysis. The statistical software Review Manager 5.4.1 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for performing the analysis on the two groups. It was concluded that the use of harmonic scalpel for thyroid surgery is useful for reducing operative time, postoperative pain, drainage volume and transient hypocalcemia, hence can be a reliable and a safe tool compared to conventional techniques often used for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.