Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742434›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2023

Nutritional aspects and dietary benefits of "Silkworms": Current scenario and future outlook.

Deepak Kumar Mahanta, J Komal, Ipsita Samal, Tanmaya Kumar Bhoi, Vinod Kumar Dubey, Kiranamaya Pradhan, Aarthi Nekkanti, M N Rudra Gouda, Varun Saini, Nikita Negi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak Kumar MahantaDepartment of Entomology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, Bihar, India.
J KomalDepartment of Entomology, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India.
Ipsita SamalDepartment of Entomology, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Tanmaya Kumar BhoiForest Protection Division, ICFRE - Arid Forest Research Institute (AFRI), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Vinod Kumar DubeyDepartment of Entomology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, Bihar, India.
Kiranamaya PradhanDepartment of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.
Aarthi NekkantiDepartment of Entomology, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India.
M N Rudra GoudaDivision of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Varun SainiDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India.
Nikita NegiDepartment of Entomology, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India.
Sheenam BhatejaDepartment of Entomology, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Hansa Kumari JatDepartment of Entomology, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Deepika JeengarDepartment of Entomology, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University · INIndira Gandhi Agricultural University · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Council of Forestry Research and Education · INMaharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology · INNavsari Agricultural University · INSri Sri University · INSwami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University · INUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current scenario, it is estimated that by 2050, there will be an additional 2.5 billion people and a 70% increase in food demand. Crop yields are not increasing fast enough to support global needs, and world agriculture is facing several serious challenges. Therefore, insects can be a nutritious alternative to meet the ever-increasing food demand in the present and future. The majority of insect consumption occurs in developing countries, with approximately 1,900 insect species consumed worldwide. Food and feed derived from them are of high quality, have a high feed conversion ratio and emit a low level of greenhouse gases. Among insects silkworms are beneficial to humans, not only because of their high nutritional value, but also because of their several pharmacological properties. Silkworm eggs, larvae, and pupae contains high amount of proteins, oils, minerals, vitamins, and several other beneficial components which are nutritious as well as have positive effect on human health. Studies have shown that silkworm pupae protect the liver, enhance immunity, inhibit apoptosis, inhibit cancer, inhibit tumor growth, inhibit microbial growth, regulate blood glucose and blood lipids, and lower blood pressure. This review paper summerized the nutritional value of different life stages of silkworm, nutritional comparison of silkworm with the major human foods, and the effects of silkworm consumption on human health, thus ittargets to generate interest toward in sericulture and improve human health by using silkworm as a nutritious food and attain sustainability in food and nutritional security.

Indexed as

consumptionhealthinsectnutritionpupaesilkworm

Identifiers

PMID36742434
PMCPMC9892554
OpenAlexW4317387972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.