ArticleSN computer science2023
An Integrated Intelligent System for Breast Cancer Detection at Early Stages Using IR Images and Machine Learning Methods with Explainability.
Article in SN computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection with Different Modalities: Mammography, Ultrasound, and Thermography Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Novel feature-based method for multi-modal biomedical image registration compared to intensity-based technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Method for Breast Cancer Detection Using Thermography Images with Optimized CNN Feature and Efficient Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- LightweightUNet: Multimodal Deep Learning with GAN-Augmented Imaging Data for Efficient Breast Cancer Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Fully Interpretable Deep Learning Model Using IR Thermal Images for Possible Breast Cancer Cases.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comprehensive analysis of recent advancements in cancer detection using machine learning and deep learning models for improved diagnostics.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Prognostic models for breast cancer: based on logistics regression and Hybrid Bayesian Network.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Current Use of Infrared Thermography in Orthopaedic and Bone or Joint Trauma Patients-Can We Identify Postoperative Infection? A Narrative Systematic Review.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second most common cause of death among women. An early diagnosis is vital for reducing the fatality rate in the fight against breast cancer. Thermography could be suggested as a safe, non-invasive, non-contact supplementary method to diagnose breast cancer and can be the most promising method for breast self-examination as envisioned by the World Health Organization (WHO). Moreover, thermography could be combined with artificial intelligence and automated diagnostic methods towards a diagnosis with a negligible number of false positive or false negative results. In the current study, a novel intelligent integrated diagnosis system is proposed using IR thermal images with Convolutional Neural Networks and Bayesian Networks to achieve good diagnostic accuracy from a relatively small dataset of images and data. We demonstrate the juxtaposition of transfer learning models such as ResNet50 with the proposed combination of BNs with artificial neural network methods such as CNNs which provides a state-of-the-art expert system with explainability. The novelties of our methodology include: (i) the construction of a diagnostic tool with high accuracy from a small number of images for training; (ii) the features extracted from the images are found to be the appropriate ones leading to very good diagnosis; (iii) our expert model exhibits interpretability, i.e., one physician can understand which factors/features play critical roles for the diagnosis. The results of the study showed an accuracy that varies for the most successful models amongst four implemented approaches from approximately 91% to 93%, with a precision value of 91% to 95%, sensitivity from 91% to 92 %, and with specificity from 91% to 97%. In conclusion, we have achieved accurate diagnosis with understandability with the novel integrated approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.