Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742399›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Prognosis comparison between small cell carcinoma of ovary and high-grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective observational cohort study.

Dongzhi Hu, Dongdong Ma, Zi-Jian Zhang, Yongjing Zhang, Kangni Huang, Xiaoxue Li

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dongzhi HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yiyang Central Hospital, Yiyang, China.
Dongdong MaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China.
Zi-Jian ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yongjing ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kangni HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yiyang Central Hospital, Yiyang, China.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNYichang Central People's Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNGuangxi University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small cell carcinoma of ovary (SCCO) is a rare and aggressive cancer primarily reported in the form of case reports. Due to limited epidemiological and prognostic analyses based on large populations, SCCO has varied considerably without prognostic models and a recognized first-line treatment strategy. The study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and prognosis of SCCO and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most prevalent subtype of ovarian cancer, in a large sample and develop a predictive model for these two subtypes. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were analyzed for patients with SCCO or HGSOC from 2000 to 2017. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were compared between the two groups. Propensity-score matching, Cox risk regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the data. Finally, a nomogram was developed to predict the patient survival time. Results: A total of 32,185 women, including 31,979 (99.4%) diagnosed with HGSOC and 206 (0.6%) diagnosed with SCCO, were identified. Age ≤ 51 years, single, median house income less than $70,000, early stage, and unilateral disease were more common characteristics of patients with SCCO than those with HGSOC. Patients with SCCO were more likely to receive radiotherapy (6.8% vs. 0.8%, p <0.001) and have tumors ≥ 141 mm (38.3% vs. 9.7%, p <0.001) than patients with HGSOC. The independent risk factors for SCCO patients included older age at diagnosis, advanced stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, larger tumor size, and bilateral tumor. Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were significantly lower for SCCO than more malignant HGSOC. Prognostic models and nomograms had been constructed to predict the individual survival rates of patients with SCCO and HGSOC. Conclusion: Patients with SCCO presented with the early-stage disease more frequently than patients with HGSOC and had decreased overall and cancer-specific survival rates.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Small CellLung NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiesantigen 125cancer-specific survivalhigh-grade serous ovarian canceroverall survivalPropensity score matchingSEER databasesmall cell carcinoma of ovary

Identifiers

PMID36742399
PMCPMC9896785
OpenAlexW4317538227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.