Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742295›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Longitudinal monitoring of mRNA-vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2.

Werner O Monzon-Posadas, Jasmin Zorn, Kathrin Peters, Maximilian Baum, Hannah Proksch, Celina Beta Schlüter, Tanja Menting, Jernej Pušnik, Hendrik Streeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Werner O Monzon-PosadasInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jasmin ZornInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kathrin PetersInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maximilian BaumInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hannah ProkschInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Celina Beta SchlüterInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tanja MentingOccupational Medicine Department, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jernej PušnikInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hendrik StreeckInstitute of Virology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Worldwide vaccination campaigns significantly reduced mortality caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection and diminished the devastating effects of the pandemic. The first approved vaccines are based on novel mRNA technology and elicit potent immune responses offering high levels of protection from severe disease. Methods: Here we longitudinally assessed adaptive immune responses during a 12-month follow-up period after the initial immunization with 2 doses of mRNA vaccines and after the booster dose in blood and saliva. Results: Our findings demonstrate a rapid waning of the anti-spike IgG titers between months 3 and 6 after the initial vaccination (1.7- and 2.5-fold decrease in plasma and saliva, respectively; P<0.0001). Conversely, the frequency of spike-specific memory B cells increased during this period (2.4-fold increase; P<0.0001) while the frequency of spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells remained stable for all assessed functions: cytotoxicity, IFNγ, IL-2, and TNFα expression. Booster vaccination significantly improved the antibody response in plasma and saliva, with the most profound changes observed in the neutralization capacity against the currently circulating omicron variant (25.6-fold increase; P<0.0001). The positive effect of booster vaccination was also evident for spike-specific IgG+ memory B cell (2.4-fold increase; P<0.0001) and cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (1.7- and 1.9-fold increase respectively; P<0.05). Conclusions: Collectively, our findings offer a detailed insight into the kinetics of adaptive immune response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and underline the beneficial effects of a booster vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdaptive ImmunityHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GantibodyB cellboosterCOVID-19longitudinalSARS-CoV-2T cellvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36742295
PMCPMC9893859
OpenAlexW4317502154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.