Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742222›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2022

Developing a Prospective Incident-Reporting System for Clinical Perfusion Practice in the United States.

Michael Colligan, Theron Paugh, Sean Murtha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perfusion Measures and Outcomes (PERForm) registry: First annual report.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2024
    Article
  2. Open Access Publishing and New Perfusion Safety Initiative.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael ColliganOrrum Clinical Analytics, Plymouth, Michigan.
Theron PaughOrrum Clinical Analytics, Plymouth, Michigan.
Sean MurthaOrrum Clinical Analytics, Plymouth, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For nearly 20 years, prominent perfusionists have called for a perfusion-centric prospective incident-reporting system to collect near-miss and patient harm incidents that occur during clinical practice in the United States. In this article, we describe the development of a widely available prospective incident-reporting system for use by perfusionists in the United States. The system was developed in three phases: literature review, system incorporation, and submission for listing as a Patient Safety Organization (PSO). It is anticipated that the knowledge gained from analysis of events contributed to this PSO-protected reporting system will lead to improvements in safety and quality of perfusion services, as well as expanding the understanding of best practices in training, equipment use, system design, and simulation scenarios.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyRisk ManagementHumansPerfusionProspective StudiesUnited StatesaccidentsCPB complications.incident reportingnear-missPatient Safety Organization (PSO)perfusion safety

Identifiers

PMID36742222
PMCPMC9891481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.