Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742112›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023

Evaluating patients' choice of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section and associated factors: a descriptive study.

Seyed A Emadi, Afshin Gholipour Baradari, Mohammad Khademloo, Mehdi Abotorabi, Farshad Hassanzadeh Kiabi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06910826 (Explaining Spinal Anesthesia to Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06910826 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Explaining Spinal Anesthesia to Pregnant Women: A Visual Approach to Overcoming Fears

TypeobservationalSponsorIstinye UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled318ConditionsIncidence of Spinal Anesthesia Preference
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Anesthesia Type on Airway Assessment Tests in Cesarean Delivery Operations: A Prospective Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Seyed A EmadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine.
Afshin Gholipour BaradariDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine.
Mohammad KhademlooDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Orthopedic Research Center.
Mehdi AbotorabiResearch Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Farshad Hassanzadeh KiabiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRORCID · USOrthopedic Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During an elective cesarean section, the choice of method of anesthesia is critical for maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the anesthesiologist's decision is dependent on the patient's desire. This study aimed to determine the choice of general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing elective cesarean sections and the factors affecting their choice. Methods: In this descriptive study, pregnant women who had the ability to undergo both spinal and general anesthesia were referred to public and private hospitals in (Sari Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences). A questionnaire recorded the patient's demographic data, education and occupation, history of anesthesia, choice of anesthetic method, and reason for selection. Results: A total of 384 women were included in the study, of whom 60% selected general anesthesia and 40% selected spinal anesthesia. Among the reasons for not choosing spinal anesthesia, most common were fear of injury to the spinal cord (64.3%) and fear of seeing and hearing during the surgery (53.3%), and among the reasons for not choosing general anesthesia, most common were fear of not waking (54.3%) and a desire to be alert at the time of infant birth (40.7%). Most of the women with a history of spinal anesthesia selected spinal anesthesia (53%), and 62% of those without a history of spinal anesthesia selected general anesthesia. Factors such as age, nonmedical staff advice, and being employed were significantly correlated with the choice of anesthesia ( Conclusion: The rate of general anesthesia selection was higher than spinal anesthesia. More attention and efforts are required to educate patients regarding the method of anesthesia prior to the surgery.

Indexed as

anesthesiacesarean sectionspinal anesthesiasurgerywomen

Identifiers

PMID36742112
PMCPMC9893422
OpenAlexW4319293941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.