Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36742065›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology plus2023

Reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay as a rapid molecular diagnostic tool for COVID-19 in healthcare workers.

Victor Dos Santos Barboza, William Borges Domingues, Thobias Toniolo de Souza, Tiago Veiras Collares, Fabiana Kommling Seixas, Bruna Silveira Pacheco, Fernanda Severo Sabedra Sousa, Thaís Larré Oliveira, Marcelo de Lima, Claúdio Martin Pereira de Pereira and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Carrageenan fromBiosensors · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor Dos Santos BarbozaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular de Micro-organismos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
William Borges DominguesLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Thobias Toniolo de SouzaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular de Micro-organismos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Tiago Veiras CollaresLaboratório de Biotecnologia do Câncer, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fabiana Kommling SeixasLaboratório de Biotecnologia do Câncer, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Bruna Silveira PachecoLaboratório de Biotecnologia do Câncer, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda Severo Sabedra SousaLaboratório de Biotecnologia do Câncer, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Thaís Larré OliveiraLaboratório de Vacinologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Marcelo de LimaLaboratório de Virologia e Imunologia, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Claúdio Martin Pereira de PereiraLaboratório de Lipidômica e Bio-Orgânica, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernando Rosado SpilkiLaboratório de Microbiologia Molecular, Universidade FEEVALE, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Janice Luehring GiongoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular de Micro-organismos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rodrigo de Almeida VaucherLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular de Micro-organismos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In December 2019, the Chinese Center for Disease Control (CDC of China) reported an outbreak of pneumonia in the city of Wuhan (Hubei province, China) that haunted the world, resulting in a global pandemic. This outbreak was caused by a betacoronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several of these cases have been observed in healthcare professionals working in hospitals and providing care on the pandemic's frontline. In the present study, nasopharyngeal swab samples of healthcare workers were used to assess the performance of the reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay and subsequently compared with the real-time reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method. Thus, in this study, we validated a method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 based on RT-LAMP that can be used to diagnose these workers. The methodology used was based on analyzing the sensitivity, specificity, evaluation of the detection limit, and cross-reaction with other respiratory viruses. The agreement was estimated using a dispersion diagram designed using the Bland-Altman method. A total of 100 clinical specimens of nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic healthcare workers in Pelotas, Brazil, during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. RT-LAMP assay, it was possible to detect SARS-CoV-2 in 96.7% of the healthcare professionals tested using the E gene and N gene primers approximately and 100% for the gene of human β-actin. The observed agreement was considered excellent for the primer set of the E and N genes (

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare workersRT-LAMPSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36742065
PMCPMC9891106
OpenAlexW4318203713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.