ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Effectiveness of Diabetes Case Conferencing Program on Diabetes Management.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Innovation and Integrated Care in People With Diabetes in Western Sydney: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Effect of video conferencing between primary and secondary care specialists on type 2 diabetes medication.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Diabetes case conferencing is where an endocrinologist visits a general practitioner (GP) to advise on the care of patients with diabetes. Past case conferencing studies have reported improved diabetes management and clinical outcomes in primary care. This study investigated the effectiveness of a diabetes case conferencing program in South Western Sydney, Australia. Methods: Complex diabetes cases were referred by general practitioners to a visiting endocrinologist for review after obtaining patient consent. The patient was not usually present. After the case discussion, a diabetes management plan was developed jointly by the general practice/specialist team. Clinical data were compared at baseline and each year up to three years (2017-2020) after the consultation using paired t-test. The primary outcome was HbA1c. Results: Clinical data were collected for 645/775 patients (mean age 64 ± 15(SD) years; 351 (54.4%) males from 40/43 general practices; 96.4% had type 2 diabetes; 6.5% were insulin treated, 54.3% non-insulin treated, 31.5% both insulin and non-insulin treated and 3.4% diet only. There were reductions in HbA1c by 1.0 ± 1.7% (11 ± 19 mmol/mol) (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure 8.2 ± 18.1 mmHg (p < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure 2.7 ± 11.6 mmHg (p < 0.001), total cholesterol 0.2 ± 1.7 mmol/l (p = 0.007), low-density lipoprotein 0.2 ± 1.0 mmol/l (p < 0.001), weight 3.3 ± 10.1 kg (p < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) 1.3 ± 3.5 kg/m Conclusions: Glycaemia, weight and cardiovascular risk factors improved following case conferencing consultations in a primary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.