ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Intra-individual comparison of coronary calcium scoring between photon counting detector- and energy integrating detector-CT: Effects on risk reclassification.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of photon-counting CT angiography with energy-integrating CT angiography in coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Quantification of plaque and detection of high-risk plaque characteristics based on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison between superresolution deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Coronary artery calcium score-emerging role for opportunistic screening on thoracic CT and novel applications.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Object size-dependent bias in aortic valve calcium quantification: polychromatic images vs virtual monochromatic images.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Photon-counting detector computed tomography angiogram more accurately characterizes lower extremity runoff than traditional computed tomograph angiogram.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of photon-counting and energy-integrating detector CT to identify obstructive coronary artery disease.European radiology · 2026Article
- Coronary Plaque Vulnerability and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Inflammation: Emerging Insights from Advanced CT Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Application of the Novel Two-Compartmental Model to Quantify Coronary Artery Calcium: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac imaging using photon counting CT - benefits, challenges and prospects.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Photon-Counting CT in Cardiovascular Imaging: Clinical Applications.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Influence of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions on coronary CT angiography-based fractional flow reserve with photon-counting detector CT: intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Value of Ultrahigh-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Cardiac Imaging.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease: Beyond Lumen Assessment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Article
- Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Versus Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Calcium Quantitation.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare coronary artery calcium volume and score (CACS) between photon-counting detector (PCD) and conventional energy integrating detector (EID) computed tomography (CT) in a phantom and prospective patient study. Methods: A commercially available CACS phantom was scanned with a standard CACS protocol (120 kVp, slice thickness/increment 3/1.5 mm, and a quantitative Qr36 kernel), with filtered back projection on the EID-CT, and with monoenergetic reconstruction at 70 keV and quantum iterative reconstruction off on the PCD-CT. The same settings were used to prospectively acquire data in patients ( Results: Based on the phantom experiment, CACS Conclusion: CACS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.