Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741714›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

The treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia in 2023: Paradigm, advances, and future directions.

Sunil Girish Iyer, Laila Elias, Michele Stanchina, Justin Watts

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cetyl All-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunil Girish IyerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Laila EliasUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Michele StanchinaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Justin WattsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transformation of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) from an often fatal to highly curable cancer with long-term survival exceeding 90% is one of the greatest and most inspiring successes in oncology. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of APL heralded the introduction of highly effective therapies targeting the mutant protein that drives the disease, leading to the chemotherapy-free approach to cure almost all patients. In this review, we discuss the paradigm of treatment of APL in 2023, reinforce the high risk of early death without prompt initiation of treatment at first clinical suspicion, and dedicate a special focus to novel agents and future directions to improve cure rates and quality of life in patients affected by APL.

Indexed as

acute promyelocytic leukemiaall-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)arsenic trioxide (ATO)coagulopathydifferentiation syndromedisseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)oral arsenic

Identifiers

PMID36741714
PMCPMC9889825
OpenAlexW4317036830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.