ArticleCureus2023
Understanding the Trajectory to a Diagnosis of Tetanus: A Descriptive Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncommon intraoral source of generalized tetanus: Case report and review of intensive care strategies.IDCases · 2026Article
- The Myriad Presentations of Tetanus: Where Do You Look for Clinical Clues in an Intubated Highly Sedated Patient?Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Tetanus is a rare but potentially fatal disease in developed countries, including Japan. It is very difficult to diagnose this condition early because of its broad symptomatology and the lack of familiarity with tetanus among both physicians and patients. In this study, we aimed to describe the clinical manifestations of tetanus and to examine as to which departments/branches of medicine patients consult in order to provide helpful information for diagnosing this challenging condition. Materials and methods This was a descriptive, retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary hospital from January 2011 to December 2021. Patients with generalized tetanus, cephalic tetanus, and local tetanus presenting to our emergency department were included in the study. We examined the clinical manifestations and departments that patients with tetanus visited first. Additionally, the initial diagnosis and diagnostic evaluation before the diagnosis were examined. Results Of the total 10 patients included in the study, nine had generalized tetanus and one had cephalic tetanus; the common initial manifestations were neck stiffness (30%), dysarthria (20%), and trismus (20%). Of note, 80% of patients also complained of dysphagia before the diagnosis. Patients first visited various departments, including a dental clinic (30%) and the department of otorhinolaryngology (20%). Only two patients were accurately diagnosed with tetanus at the first department they visited. Physicians performed head imaging for all the patients. Conclusions Based on our findings, in Japan, patients with tetanus present with symptoms that physicians interpret or suspect to be associated with disorders of the central nervous system. Meanwhile, patients themselves tend to consider the symptoms as indicative of oral or dental issues. Further prospective studies involving a larger number of participants are needed to investigate the clinical course of tetanus until the establishment of a diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.