Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741465›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Stochastic block models reveal a robust nested pattern in healthy human gut microbiomes.

Sergio Cobo-López, Vinod K Gupta, Jaeyun Sung, Roger Guimerà, Marta Sales-Pardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio Cobo-LópezDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 40007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-6205
Vinod K GuptaMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jaeyun SungMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Roger GuimeràDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 40007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-4310
Marta Sales-PardoDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 40007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-6525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question in human gut microbiome research is what are the robust structural patterns underlying its taxonomic composition. Herein, we use whole metagenomic datasets from healthy human guts to show that such robust patterns do exist, albeit not in the conventional enterotype sense. We first introduce the concept of mixed-membership enterotypes using a network inference approach based on stochastic block models. We find that gut microbiomes across a group of people (hosts) display a nested structure, which has been observed in a number of ecological systems. This finding led us to designate distinct ecological roles to both microbes and hosts: generalists and specialists. Specifically, generalist hosts have microbiomes with most microbial species, while specialist hosts only have generalist microbes. Moreover, specialist microbes are only present in generalist hosts. From the nested structure of microbial taxonomies, we show that these ecological roles of microbes are generally conserved across datasets. Our results show that the taxonomic composition of healthy human gut microbiomes is associated with robustly structured combinations of generalist and specialist species.

Indexed as

ecological networkshuman microbiomenestednessstatistical inferencestochastic block models

Identifiers

PMID36741465
PMCPMC9896942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.