Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741441›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Experimental reductions in subdaily flow fluctuations increased gross primary productivity for 425 river kilometers downstream.

Bridget R Deemer, Charles B Yackulic, Robert O Hall, Michael J Dodrill, Theodore A Kennedy, Jeffrey D Muehlbauer, David J Topping, Nicholas Voichick, Michael D Yard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Macroscale controls determine the recovery of river ecosystem productivity following flood disturbances.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bridget R DeemerSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Charles B YackulicSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Robert O HallFlathead Lake Biological Station, University of Montana, Polson, MT 59860, USA.
Michael J DodrillSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Theodore A KennedySouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Jeffrey D MuehlbauerSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
David J ToppingSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Nicholas VoichickSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
Michael D YardSouthwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic primary production is the foundation of many river food webs. Dams change the physical template of rivers, often driving food webs toward greater reliance on aquatic primary production. Nonetheless, the effects of regulated flow regimes on primary production are poorly understood. Load following is a common dam flow management strategy that involves subdaily changes in water releases proportional to fluctuations in electrical power demand. This flow regime causes an artificial tide, wetting and drying channel margins and altering river depth and water clarity, all processes that are likely to affect primary production. In collaboration with dam operators, we designed an experimental flow regime whose goal was to mitigate negative effects of load following on ecosystem processes. The experimental flow contrasted steady-low flows on weekends with load following flows on weekdays. Here, we quantify the effect of this experimental flow on springtime gross primary production (GPP) 90-to-425 km downstream of Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River, AZ, USA. GPP during steady-low flows was 41% higher than during load following flows, mostly owing to nonlinear reductions in sediment-driven turbidity. The experimental flow increased weekly GPP even after controlling for variation in weekly mean discharge, demonstrating a negative effect of load following on GPP. We estimate that this environmental flow increased springtime carbon fixation by 0.27 g C m

Indexed as

dameco-flowshydropeakinghydropowerload followingprimary production

Identifiers

PMID36741441
PMCPMC9896909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.