Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741429›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science.

Rafael Muñoz-Tamayo, Birte L Nielsen, Mohammed Gagaoua, Florence Gondret, E Tobias Krause, Diego P Morgavi, I Anna S Olsson, Matti Pastell, Masoomeh Taghipoor, Luis Tedeschi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Framework for Transparency in Precision Livestock Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. mSystems · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rafael Muñoz-TamayoINRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9266-4132
Birte L NielsenUniversities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW), The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire AL4 8AN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-6329
Mohammed GagaouaTeagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, D15 KN3K Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-3379
Florence GondretPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-1560
E Tobias KrauseInstitute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Dörnbergstr. 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-3711
Diego P MorgaviUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-0937
I Anna S Olssoni3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-180 Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4369-8723
Matti PastellNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5810-4801
Masoomeh TaghipoorINRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-1578
Luis TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-4911
Isabelle VeissierUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-5395
Christian NawrothInstitute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-4057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Open Science movement aims at ensuring accessibility, reproducibility, and transparency of research. The adoption of Open Science practices in animal science, however, is still at an early stage. To move ahead as a field, we here provide seven practical steps to embrace Open Science in animal science. We hope that this paper contributes to the shift in research practices of animal scientists towards open, reproducible, and transparent science, enabling the field to gain additional public trust and deal with future challenges to guarantee reliable research. Although the paper targets primarily animal science researchers, the steps discussed here are also applicable to other research domains.

Indexed as

animal researchopen accessopen dataopen peer-reviewpreregistration

Identifiers

PMID36741429
PMCPMC9896936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.