Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741366›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Identification and classification of distinct surface markers of T regulatory cells.

Agnieszka S Wegrzyn, Anna E Kedzierska, Andrzej Obojski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. From Tregs to tissue remodelling: FOXP3 and IL-35 in the inflammatory landscape of nasal polyps.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Broad systemic T cell immunity toFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnieszka S WegrzynŁukasiewicz Research Network - PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, Bioengineering Group, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna E KedzierskaŁukasiewicz Research Network - PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, Bioengineering Group, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej ObojskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Allergology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regulatory T (Treg) cells have emerged as key players in the maintenance of immune homeostasis. Although significant progress has been made in recent years to define the Treg surface markers involved with or identifying their suppressive function, there remains much to be elucidated, and many questions persist. This study determined the expression of surface markers on human peripheral Treg cells and conventional T (Tconv) cells in a steady state and after activation to gain insight into their mechanism of action and more precisely characterize this regulatory population in humans. Methods: To screen Treg and Tconv cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from volunteers, stained with a commercially available lyophilized antibody array comprising 371 surface antigens, and analyzed by flow cytometry. To compare Treg cells with activated Tconv cells, PBMCs were stimulated with PMA and further stained similar to freshly isolated cells. Results: Treg and Tconv cells were positive for 135 and 168 of the 371 antigens, respectively. Based on the frequency distribution, all of the most highly expressed markers identified were shared by both Treg and Tconv cells and participate in T cell activation, act as costimulatory and signaling molecules, or exhibit adhesion and migratory functions. Additionally, we identified several differences in marker expression between Treg and Tconv cells, with most found in the expression of co-stimulatory (ICOS, GITR, 4-1BB) and co-inhibitory (TIGIT, CTLA-4) molecules, as well as chemokine receptors (CXCR4, CXCR5, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CCR8, and CXCR7). Furthermore, post-activation expression of surface molecules identified molecules capable of discriminating Treg cells from activated Tconv cells (GITR, 4-1BB, TIGIT, CD120b, and CD39); however, almost all of these markers were also expressed in a small fraction of activated Tconv cells. Conclusions: These results offer insight into the biology of Tregs and contribute to their accurate identification and characterization in variety of immunological diseases as well as physiological processes.

Indexed as

Leukocytes, MononuclearT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryFlow CytometryHumansLymphocyte ActivationSignal Transductionactivated T cellsconventional T cellsflow cytometryphenotypingregulatory T cellssurface markersTreg markers

Identifiers

PMID36741366
PMCPMC9892051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.