Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36741271›Full record

ReviewCurrent fungal infection reports2023

Candidiasis and Other Emerging Yeasts.

Megha Sharma, Arunaloke Chakrabarti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current fungal infection reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Overview of Risk Factors and Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond candidiasis: should infections caused byJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. First case of a humanASM case reports · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megha SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, India.
Arunaloke ChakrabartiDoodhdhari Burfani Hospital and Research Institute, Haridwar, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-3807
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The review presents a comprehensive and updated information on the contemporary status of invasive candidiasis (IC), other emerging yeast infections, and the challenges they present in terms of at-risk population, specific virulence attributes, and antifungal susceptibility profile. Recent Findings: With the advancement in medical field, there has been parallel expansion of vulnerable populations over the past two decades. This had led to the emergence of a variety of rare yeasts in healthcare settings, both Summary: The challenges in management of IC have been complicated with emergence of newer species and resistance traits.

Indexed as

Emerging fungiFungal taxonomyInvasive candidiasisNon-albicans Candida

Identifiers

PMID36741271
PMCPMC9886541
OpenAlexW4318592269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.