ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2022
Nasal dexmedetomidine in sedation of electroencephalogram (EEG) in comparison with chloral hydrate as a clinical trial.
Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sedative for Sleep Electroencephalogram Records - A Debate of Ideal vs. Practical.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn electroencephalogram (EEG) is a test that measures the brain's electrical activity. Here we decided to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two drugs, hydrate, and nasal dexmedetomidine, in creating sedation during EEG in children.
methodsThis clinical trial was performed in 2020-2022 on 65 children that were candidates for sedation for EEG with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code IRCT20210614051574N8 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/61860). Pediatrics were randomized into two groups. Children in the first group received intranasal dexmedetomidine at a dose of 2-3 µg/kg 10 minutes before the procedure. The second group received 5% chloral hydrate syrup at a dose of 50-100 mg/kg orally 10 minutes before the procedure. For each patient, sleep onset latency and sleep duration were also measured. It should be noted that the patient's level of consciousness and sleepiness were checked by AVPU (alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive) criteria.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the mean sleep onset latency (P = 0.59), sleep duration (P = 0.12), heart rate (P = 0.30), respiratory rate (P = 0.26), and SPO2 (P = 0.27). Analysis of covariance by adjusting for age and sex in both groups showed that the mean sleep duration (P = 0.04) and heart rate (P = 0.03) in the oral chloral hydrate group were significantly higher than in the nasal dexmedetomidine group. But the mean of other variables was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).
conclusionThe mean sleep duration and heart rate were significantly lower in the intranasal dexmedetomidine group compared to the oral chloral hydrate group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36741200PMC9890201W4319294132What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.