Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36740888›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.

Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Tracey H Sach, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in CONSORT 2025].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-5260
Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Taeko BecquePrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Beth StuartPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Julie HooperPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Mary SteelePrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Sylvia WilczynskaKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
Tracey H SachHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Matthew J RiddPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Amanda RobertsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Amina AhmedCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Kate GreenwellSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Katy SivyerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jacqui NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trial Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trial Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sandra LawtonThe Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK.
Sinéad M LanganDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Laura M HowellsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Paul LeightonCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Hywel C WilliamsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBKing's College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205039/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of two online behavioural interventions, one for parents and carers and one for young people, to support eczema self-management.

designTwo independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trials.

setting98 general practices in England.

participantsParents and carers of children (0-12 years) with eczema (trial 1) and young people (13-25 years) with eczema (trial 2), excluding people with inactive or very mild eczema (≤5 on POEM, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure).

interventionsParticipants were randomised (1:1) using online software to receive usual eczema care or an online (www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) behavioural intervention for eczema plus usual care.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was eczema symptoms rated using POEM (range 0-28, with 28 being very severe) every four weeks over 24 weeks. Outcomes were reported by parents or carers for children and by self-report for young people. Secondary outcomes included POEM score every four weeks over 52 weeks, quality of life, eczema control, itch intensity (young people only), patient enablement, treatment use, perceived barriers to treatment use, and intervention use. Analyses were carried out separately for the two trials and according to intention-to-treat principles.

results340 parents or carers of children (169 usual care; 171 intervention) and 337 young people (169 usual care; 168 intervention) were randomised. The mean baseline POEM score was 12.8 (standard deviation 5.3) for parents and carers and 15.2 (5.4) for young people. Three young people withdrew from follow-up but did not withdraw their data. All randomised participants were included in the analyses. At 24 weeks, follow-up rates were 91.5% (311/340) for parents or carers and 90.2% (304/337) for young people. After controlling for baseline eczema severity and confounders, compared with usual care groups over 24 weeks, eczema severity improved in the intervention groups: mean difference in POEM score -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.6; P=0.002) for parents or carers and -1.9 (-3.0 to -0.8; P<0.001) for young people. The number needed to treat to achieve a 2.5 difference in POEM score at 24 weeks was 6 in both trials. Improvements were sustained to 52 weeks in both trials. Enablement showed a statistically significant difference favouring the intervention group in both trials: adjusted mean difference at 24 weeks -0.7 (95% confidence interval -1.0 to -0.4) for parents or carers and -0.9 (-1.3 to -0.6) for young people. No harms were identified in either group.

conclusionsTwo online interventions for self-management of eczema aimed at parents or carers of children with eczema and at young people with eczema provide a useful, sustained benefit in managing eczema severity in children and young people when offered in addition to usual eczema care.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN79282252.

Indexed as

EczemaInternet-Based InterventionAdolescentCaregiversChildCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality of LifeSelf CareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36740888
PMCPMC11778922
OpenAlexW4310832257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.