Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022
Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Psychological Interventions on Itch, Scratching, and Excoriations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for children with dermatological conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Pooled it
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- Educational and psychological interventions for managing atopic dermatitis (eczema).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of atopic dermatitis patient education programs - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Mobile Health App as an Auxiliary Tool in Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR dermatology · 2025Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Trial
- Remote Interdisciplinary Care for Atopic Dermatitis Using a Digital Care Concept (ADCompanion): Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Advancing dermatology patients' quality of life through digital health innovations: a comprehensive systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Do remote clinical trials offer carbon savings while maintaining research quality? Experiences from the Eczema Bathing Study.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing Self-Management Behaviors in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Intervention Strategies: A Narrative Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Planning and optimizing a digital self-management support intervention: Acne Care Online.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in CONSORT 2025].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of the prospective acceptability of the MiDerm app; a complex digital intervention for adults living with skin conditions.British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Evidence to practice - lessons learnt in developing an implementation strategy for an online digital health intervention (Eczema Care Online).BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Advancing equity in allergy and immunology: progress, pitfalls, and the path forward.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Determining the minimal important change of the recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in clinical trials.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of two online behavioural interventions, one for parents and carers and one for young people, to support eczema self-management.
designTwo independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trials.
setting98 general practices in England.
participantsParents and carers of children (0-12 years) with eczema (trial 1) and young people (13-25 years) with eczema (trial 2), excluding people with inactive or very mild eczema (≤5 on POEM, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure).
interventionsParticipants were randomised (1:1) using online software to receive usual eczema care or an online (www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) behavioural intervention for eczema plus usual care.
main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was eczema symptoms rated using POEM (range 0-28, with 28 being very severe) every four weeks over 24 weeks. Outcomes were reported by parents or carers for children and by self-report for young people. Secondary outcomes included POEM score every four weeks over 52 weeks, quality of life, eczema control, itch intensity (young people only), patient enablement, treatment use, perceived barriers to treatment use, and intervention use. Analyses were carried out separately for the two trials and according to intention-to-treat principles.
results340 parents or carers of children (169 usual care; 171 intervention) and 337 young people (169 usual care; 168 intervention) were randomised. The mean baseline POEM score was 12.8 (standard deviation 5.3) for parents and carers and 15.2 (5.4) for young people. Three young people withdrew from follow-up but did not withdraw their data. All randomised participants were included in the analyses. At 24 weeks, follow-up rates were 91.5% (311/340) for parents or carers and 90.2% (304/337) for young people. After controlling for baseline eczema severity and confounders, compared with usual care groups over 24 weeks, eczema severity improved in the intervention groups: mean difference in POEM score -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.6; P=0.002) for parents or carers and -1.9 (-3.0 to -0.8; P<0.001) for young people. The number needed to treat to achieve a 2.5 difference in POEM score at 24 weeks was 6 in both trials. Improvements were sustained to 52 weeks in both trials. Enablement showed a statistically significant difference favouring the intervention group in both trials: adjusted mean difference at 24 weeks -0.7 (95% confidence interval -1.0 to -0.4) for parents or carers and -0.9 (-1.3 to -0.6) for young people. No harms were identified in either group.
conclusionsTwo online interventions for self-management of eczema aimed at parents or carers of children with eczema and at young people with eczema provide a useful, sustained benefit in managing eczema severity in children and young people when offered in addition to usual eczema care.
trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN79282252.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.