Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36740718›Full record

ArticleISME communications2021

Limited resilience of the soil microbiome to mechanical compaction within four growing seasons of agricultural management.

Manon Longepierre, Franco Widmer, Thomas Keller, Peter Weisskopf, Tino Colombi, Johan Six, Martin Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pandan-vanilla rotation mitigatesFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manon LongepierreSustainable Agroecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. manon.longepierre@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6389-3278
Franco WidmerMolecular Ecology, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-8397
Thomas KellerSoil Quality and Soil Use, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter WeisskopfSoil Quality and Soil Use, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tino ColombiDepartment of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-4430
Johan SixSustainable Agroecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-4185
Martin HartmannSustainable Agroecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. martin.hartmann@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-5284

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 31003A-172942Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 406840-143061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil compaction affects many soil functions, but we have little information on the resistance and resilience of soil microorganisms to this disturbance. Here, we present data on the response of soil microbial diversity to a single compaction event and its temporal evolution under different agricultural management systems during four growing seasons. Crop yield was reduced (up to -90%) in the first two seasons after compaction, but mostly recovered in subsequent seasons. Soil compaction increased soil bulk density (+15%), and decreased air permeability (-94%) and gas diffusion (-59%), and those properties did not fully recover within four growing seasons. Soil compaction induced cropping system-dependent shifts in microbial community structures with little resilience over the four growing seasons. Microbial taxa sensitive to soil compaction were detected in all major phyla. Overall, anaerobic prokaryotes and saprotrophic fungi increased in compacted soils, whereas aerobic prokaryotes and plant-associated fungi were mostly negatively affected. Most measured properties showed large spatial variability across the replicated blocks, demonstrating the dependence of compaction effects on initial conditions. This study demonstrates that soil compaction is a disturbance that can have long-lasting effects on soil properties and soil microorganisms, but those effects are not necessarily aligned with changes in crop yield.

Identifiers

PMID36740718
PMCPMC9723577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.