Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36740257›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2024

Breath-hold High-resolution T1-weighted Gradient Echo Liver MR Imaging with Compressed Sensing Obtained during the Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatobiliary Phase: Image Quality and Lesion Visibility Compared with a Standard T1-weighted Sequence.

Kenichiro Ihara, Hideko Onoda, Masahiro Tanabe, Etsushi Iida, Takaaki Ueda, Taiga Kobayashi, Mayumi Higashi, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Hiroshi Imai, Katsuyoshi Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Differential Diagnosis Using MRI of Canine Intestinal Neoplasms, Including Lymphoma, Adenocarcinoma, and Inflammatory Polyp: Case Series.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. High-spatial-resolution Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Using An Optimized Integrated Combination of Parallel Imaging and Compressed Sensing Technique.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kenichiro IharaDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Hideko OnodaDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Masahiro TanabeDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Etsushi IidaDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takaaki UedaDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Taiga KobayashiDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Mayumi HigashiDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.
Marcel Dominik NickelMR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH.
Hiroshi ImaiMR Research & Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare K.K.
Katsuyoshi ItoDepartment of Radiology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility of breath-hold (BH) high-resolution (HR) T1-weighted gradient echo hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging using compressed sensing (CS) in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI in comparison with standard HBP imaging using parallel imaging (PI).

methodsThe study included 122 patients with liver tumors with hypointensity in the HBP who underwent both HR HBP imaging with CS and standard HBP imaging with PI. Two radiologists evaluated the liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel conspicuity, bile duct conspicuity, image noise, and overall image quality, as well as the lesion conspicuity on HR and standard HBP imaging and the contrast-enhanced (CE) MR cholangiography (MRC) image quality reconstructed from HBP images. As a quantitative analysis, the SNR of the liver and the liver to lesion signal intensity ratio (LLSIR) were also determined.

resultsThe liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel conspicuity, bile duct conspicuity, and overall image quality as well as the lesion conspicuity and the LLSIR on HR HBP imaging with CS were significantly higher than those on standard HBP imaging (all of P < 0.001). The image quality of CE-MRC reconstructed from HR HBP imaging with CS was also significantly higher than that from standard HBP imaging (P < 0.001). Conversely, the SNR of liver in standard HBP was significantly higher than that in HR HBP with CS (P < 0.001).

conclusionBH HR HBP imaging with CS provided an improved overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and CE-MRC visualization when compared with standard HBP imaging without extending the acquisition time.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaImaging, Three-DimensionalGadolinium DTPAHumansImage EnhancementLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAcompressed sensinggadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethlenetriamine pentaacetic acidhepatobiliary phasemagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID36740257
PMCPMC11024715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.