Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36739499›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Dependence of clinical outcomes on time of hospital admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Mehmet Ozbek, Kamran Ildirimli, Baran Arik, Adem Aktan, Mehmet Sait Coskun, Ali Evsen, Tuncay Guzel, Halit Acet, Muhammed Demira

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet OzbekFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-6190
Kamran IldirimliFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Baran ArikFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Adem AktanFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Mehmet Sait CoskunFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Ali EvsenFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Tuncay GuzelFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Halit AcetFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Muhammed DemiraFrom the Department of Cardiology, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkiye.
Dicle University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference.

objectivesInvestigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission.

designRetrospective

settingTertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals.

main outcome measuresClinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women.

resultsPatients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (

conclusionsWhile patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes. LIMITATIONS: More "real world" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPulmonary EdemaST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionFemaleHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36739499
PMCPMC9899343
OpenAlexW4319262162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.