Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36739325›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Face pareidolia is enhanced by 40 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) of the face perception network.

Annalisa Palmisano, Giulio Chiarantoni, Francesco Bossi, Alessio Conti, Vitiana D'Elia, Serena Tagliente, Michael A Nitsche, Davide Rivolta

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dynamic brain communication underwriting face pareidolia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Annalisa Palmisano *Department of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. annalisa.palmisano@uniba.it.
Giulio Chiarantoni *Department of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Francesco BossiIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Alessio ContiDepartment of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Vitiana D'EliaDepartment of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Serena TaglienteDepartment of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Davide RivoltaDepartment of Education, Psychology, and Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITTU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pareidolia refers to the perception of ambiguous sensory patterns as carrying a specific meaning. In its most common form, pareidolia involves human-like facial features, where random objects or patterns are illusionary recognized as faces. The current study investigated the neurophysiological correlates of face pareidolia via transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). tACS was delivered at gamma (40 Hz) frequency over critical nodes of the "face perception" network (i.e., right lateral occipito-temporal and left prefrontal cortex) of 75 healthy participants while completing four face perception tasks ('Mooney test' for faces, 'Toast test', 'Noise pareidolia test', 'Pareidolia task') and an object perception task ('Mooney test' for objects). In this single-blind, sham-controlled between-subjects study, participants received 35 min of either Sham, Online, (40Hz-tACS_ON), or Offline (40Hz-tACS_PRE) stimulation. Results showed that face pareidolia was causally enhanced by 40Hz-tACS_PRE in the Mooney test for faces in which, as compared to sham, participants more often misperceived scrambled stimuli as faces. In addition, as compared to sham, participants receiving 40Hz-tACS_PRE showed similar reaction times (RTs) when perceiving illusory faces and correctly recognizing noise stimuli in the Toast test, thus not exhibiting hesitancy in identifying faces where there were none. Also, 40Hz-tACS_ON induced slower rejections of face pareidolia responses in the Noise pareidolia test. The current study indicates that 40 Hz tACS can enhance pareidolic illusions in healthy individuals and, thus, that high frequency (i.e., gamma band) oscillations are critical in forming coherent and meaningful visual perception.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionIllusionsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansReaction TimeSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID36739325
PMCPMC9899232
OpenAlexW4319163886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.