Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36738592›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2023

The impact of COVID-19 on youth mental health: A mixed methods survey.

Imogen H Bell, Jennifer Nicholas, Amy Broomhall, Eleanor Bailey, Sarah Bendall, Alexandra Boland, Jo Robinson, Sophie Adams, Patrick McGorry, Andrew Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
44.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Imogen H BellOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: imogen.bell@orygen.org.au.
Jennifer NicholasOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Amy BroomhallDepartment of Psychology, Counselling and Therapy, La Trobe University, Australia.
Eleanor BaileyOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah BendallOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Alexandra BolandDepartment of Family Medicine & Community Health, University of Massachusetts, Medical School, Worcester, United States.
Jo RobinsonOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Sophie AdamsAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Patrick McGorryOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew ThompsonOrygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
The University of Melbourne · AUAustin Health · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented profound disruptions to young people at a critical period of psychosocial development. The current study aimed to explore the perceived negative and positive impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on young people's mental health and wellbeing across a spectrum of clinical needs. A cross-sectional online survey including both quantitative and qualitative responses captured positive and negative impacts of COVID-19 across 593 young people with and without mental health care needs. Findings revealed high levels of clinical depression (48%), anxiety (51%), and loneliness in both samples. Approximately 75% of young people in primary mental health care services, and over 80% in the general population, reported a negative impact on work, non-work activities and mental health and wellbeing. Open-ended responses reflected positive impacts in the domains of greater capacity for self-care and reflection due to the decreased pressures of daily life. Negative impacts reflected worsening mental health, disruptions to key developmental milestones regarding relationships with self and others, and limited capacity for self-care. Together, these data highlight the critical need for early intervention support for the psychosocial impacts experienced by young people due to the pandemic, particularly among those with existing mental health care needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental HealthPandemicsAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionMental healthQualitativeYoung peopleYouth

Identifiers

PMID36738592
PMCPMC9883078
OpenAlexW4319262349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.