Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36738541›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2023

Efficacy and toxicity of anti-vascular endothelial growth receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with neuroendocrine tumours - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Satya Das, Sharon Phillips, Cody L Lee, Rajiv Agarwal, Emily Bergsland, Jonathan Strosberg, Jennifer A Chan, Heather LaFerriere, Robert A Ramirez, Jordan Berlin and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Satya DasDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: satya.das@vumc.org.
Sharon PhillipsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Cody L LeeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Rajiv AgarwalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Emily BergslandDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jonathan StrosbergDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jennifer A ChanDana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather LaFerriereBiomedical Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert A RamirezDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jordan BerlinDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Arvind DasariDivison of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAlthough anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) have been tested in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) over the last two decades, no study to date has benchmarked efficacy and toxicity of these drugs in this patient population.

methodsAll phase II and phase III studies of anti-VEGF RTKIs in patients with NETs, published between January 1, 2000 andJuly 31, 2021, across major trial databases, were searched in August 2021 for relevant studies. The primary objectives of the meta-analysis were to compare objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and extra-pancreatic NETs (epNETs), and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of adverse events between patients receiving anti-VEGF RTKIs and control.

results1611 patients were available for the meta-analysis; 1194 received anti-VEGF RTKIs. ORR in pNETs was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-25%), while ORR in epNETs was 8% (95% CI 5-12%); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = 8.38, p < .01). Median PFS in pNETs was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.43-16.38 months), while median PFS in epNETs was 12.71 months (95% CI 9.37-16.05 months); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = .35, p = .55). With regards to common grade 3/4 adverse events , patients who received anti-VEGF RTKIs were more likely to experience hypertension (IRR 3.04, 95% CI 1.63-5.65) and proteinuria (IRR 5.79, 95% CI 1.09-30.74) in comparison to those who received control.

conclusionsAnti-VEGF RTKIs demonstrate anti-tumour effect in both pNETs and epNETs, supporting their development in both populations. These agents also appear to be safe in patients with NETs.

Indexed as

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsAnti-vascular endothelial growth factorNeuroendocrine tumoursObjective response rateProgression-free survivalReceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitorsSystematic review & meta-analysisToxicity

Identifiers

PMID36738541
PMCPMC10230159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.