Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36738387›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2023

Using real-world data from health systems to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a catheter to treat ischemic ventricular tachycardia.

Sanket S Dhruva, Shumin Zhang, Jiajing Chen, Peter A Noseworthy, Amit A Doshi, Kolade M Agboola, Jeph Herrin, Guoqian Jiang, Yue Yu, Guy Cafri and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sanket S DhruvaSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, 4150 Clement St, Building 203, 111C, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA. sanket.dhruva@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-2032
Shumin ZhangMedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jiajing ChenMercy Research, Mercy, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Peter A NoseworthyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amit A DoshiMercy Clinic, Mercy, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kolade M AgboolaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jeph HerrinSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Guoqian JiangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yue YuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Guy CafriMedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Kimberly Collison FarrMercy Research, Mercy, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Mwanatumu S MbwanaNational Evaluation System for Health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc), Medical Device Innovation Consortium, Arlington, VA, USA.
Joseph S RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3320
Paul M CoplanMedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Joseph P DrozdaMercy Research, Mercy, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Johnson & Johnson (United States) · USMercy Research · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMercy Clinic Neurology · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USYale New Haven Hospital · USYale University · US

Funding

Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) Pragmatic Clinical TrialUM1CA233033 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CHEVILLE, ANDREA LYNNE · 2018 to 2018
$8.7M
"Less Pain, Less Fuss, Right Now!" and "Make It Count!"- Multilevel Interventions for Patient, Parent, and Practice to Enhance Provider Recommendations for HPV VaccinationR01CA217889 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRIFFIN, JOAN M., JACOBSON, ROBERT M. · 2018 to 2023
$2.9M
Leveraging Physician Networks to Improve Care and Outcomes for Low-Income PopulationsR01HL144644 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NDUMELE, CHIMA · 2019 to 2021
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022882AHRQ HHS R01 HS025164FDA HHS U01 FD005938FDA HHS U01 FD006292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217889NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA233033NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144644U.S. Food and Drug Administration 1U01FD006292-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ThermoCool STSF catheter is used for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in routine clinical practice, although outcomes have not been studied and the catheter does not have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. We used real-world health system data to evaluate its safety and effectiveness for this indication.

methodsAmong patients undergoing ischemic VT ablation with the ThermoCool STSF catheter pooled across two health systems (Mercy Health and Mayo Clinic), the primary safety composite outcome of death, thromboembolic events, and procedural complications within 7 days was compared to a performance goal of 15%, which is twice the expected proportion of the primary composite safety outcome based on prior studies. The exploratory effectiveness outcome of rehospitalization for VT or heart failure or repeat VT ablation at up to 1 year was averaged across health systems among patients treated with the ThermoCool STSF vs. ST catheters.

resultsSeventy total patients received ablation for ischemic VT using the ThermoCool STSF catheter. The primary safety composite outcome occurred in 3/70 (4.3%; 90% CI, 1.2-10.7%) patients, meeting the pre-specified performance goal, p = 0.0045. At 1 year, the effectiveness outcome risk difference (STSF-ST) at Mercy was - 0.4% (90% CI: - 25.2%, 24.3%) and at Mayo Clinic was 12.6% (90% CI: - 13.0%, 38.4%); the average risk difference across both institutions was 5.8% (90% CI: - 12.0, 23.7).

conclusionsThe ThermoCool STSF catheter was safe and appeared effective for ischemic VT ablation, supporting continued use of the catheter and informing possible FDA label expansion. Health system data hold promise for real-world safety and effectiveness evaluation of cardiovascular devices.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationTachycardia, VentricularArrhythmias, CardiacCathetersHumansTreatment OutcomeAblationComparative effectivenessReal-world dataRoutine clinical practiceVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID36738387
PMCPMC12306424
OpenAlexW4319071824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.