Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36738314›Full record

ArticleOecologia2023

Dealing with disjunct populations of vascular plants: implications for assessing the effect of climate change.

Lucia Varaldo, Maria Guerrina, Davide Dagnino, Luigi Minuto, Gabriele Casazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prediction of the Potential Distribution ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Range Modeling and Surveillance ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucia Varaldo *Università di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, Ambiente e Vita, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy.
Maria Guerrina *Università di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, Ambiente e Vita, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-7565
Davide DagninoUniversità di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, Ambiente e Vita, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-4317
Luigi MinutoUniversità di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, Ambiente e Vita, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy. luigi.minuto@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1582-3806
Gabriele CasazzaUniversità di Genova, Dipartimento di Scienze della terra, Ambiente e Vita, Corso Europa 26, I-16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-8551

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017JW4HZK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species distribution models are the most widely used tool to predict species distributions for species conservation and assessment of climate change impact. However, they usually do not consider intraspecific ecological variation exhibited by many species. Overlooking the potential differentiation among groups of populations may lead to misplacing any conservation actions. This issue may be particularly relevant in species in which few populations with potential local adaptation occur, as in species with disjunct populations. Here, we used ecological niche modeling to analyze how the projections of current and future climatically suitable areas of 12 plant species can be affected using the whole taxa occurrences compared to occurrences from geographically disjunct populations. Niche analyses suggest that usually the disjunct group of populations selects the climatic conditions as similar as possible to the other according to climate availability. Integrating intraspecific variability only slightly increases models' ability to predict species occurrences. However, it results in different predictions of the magnitude of range change. In some species, integrating or not integrating intraspecific variability may lead to opposite trend in projected range change. Our results suggest that integrating intraspecific variability does not strongly improve overall models' accuracy, but it can result in considerably different conclusions about future range change. Consequently, accounting for intraspecific differentiation may enable the detection of potential local adaptations to new climate and so to design targeted conservation strategies.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalPlantsClimatic nicheIntraspecific variationNorthern Mediterranean mountainsSpecies distribution model

Identifiers

PMID36738314
PMCPMC9945546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.