Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737812›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Insoles to ease plantar pressure in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy: a feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study.

Richard Collings, Jennifer Freeman, Jos M Latour, Joanne Hosking, Joanne Paton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07598513 (Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07598513 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FaisalabadRan2026 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsBalance Impairment, Diabetic NeuropathyArmsGroup A (Perturbation Based Training on Firm Surface), Group B (Perturbation Based Training on Rolling Board)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard CollingsDepartment of Podiatry, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK. richard.collings@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7048-1386
Jennifer FreemanSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Jos M LatourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Joanne HoskingPeninsula Medical School (Faculty of Health), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Joanne PatonSchool of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
University of Plymouth · GBTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Research Trainees Coordinating Centre ICA-CDRF-2015-01-054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic footwear and insoles are preventative strategies to reduce elevated plantar pressures associated with diabetic foot ulcer risk. An insole intervention appropriate for chairside delivery optimising plantar foot pressure reduction in people with diabetes has been developed.

aimTo explore the feasibility and acceptability of testing an optimised insole compared with an active control insole to reduce plantar pressures for people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

methodsA double-blinded multi-centre feasibility RCT with an embedded qualitative study. Participants were randomised to either an optimised insole group (intervention) or a standard cushioned insole group (active control). Participants were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months with clinical outcomes of foot ulceration and mean peak plantar pressure (MPPP) reduction. An embedded qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 12 study participants and three podiatrists to explore their experiences of the intervention and trial procedures. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and thematic analysis (qualitative data).

resultsScreened were142 patients from which 61 were recruited; 30 participants were randomised to the intervention group and 31 to the active control group. Forty-two participants completed the study. At 12 months, 69% of the patient-reported questionnaires were returned and 68% of the clinical outcomes were collected. There were 17 incidences of foot ulceration occurring in 7/31 of the active control group and 10/30 in the intervention group. Mean difference in MPPP between the intervention and active control groups for all regions-of-interest combined favoured the intervention. Thematic analysis revealed three themes; accepting the study, behaviour and support during study procedures, and impact from study participation.

conclusionThe results of the feasibility RCT suggest that the optimised insole holds promise as an intervention, and that a full RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of this intervention is feasible and warranted for people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN16011830 . Registered 9th October 2017.

Indexed as

Diabetic footFeasibilityInsoleOffloadingPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36737812
PMCPMC9896776
OpenAlexW4319161775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.