Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737794›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2023

CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ gastric cancer stem cells predict tumor progression and metastasis: clinical and experimental evidence.

Angel A Gómez-Gallegos, Lizbeth Ramírez-Vidal, Jared Becerril-Rico, Elizabeth Pérez-Islas, Zuly J Hernandez-Peralta, Mariel E Toledo-Guzmán, Alejandro García-Carrancá, Elizabeth Langley, Angélica Hernández-Guerrero, Fernando López-Casillas and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Do Metastatic Cells Arise from PD-L1International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angel A Gómez-Gallegos *Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad de Posgrado, Edificio A, 1° Piso, Circuito de Posgrados, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, Coyoacán, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Lizbeth Ramírez-Vidal *Posgrado de Ciencias Biomédicas. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jared Becerril-RicoPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad de Posgrado, Edificio A, 1° Piso, Circuito de Posgrados, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, Coyoacán, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Elizabeth Pérez-IslasDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Zuly J Hernandez-PeraltaSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mariel E Toledo-GuzmánSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro García-CarrancáSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elizabeth LangleySubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Angélica Hernández-GuerreroUnidad de Endoscopia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fernando López-CasillasInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Herrera-GoepfertDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis F Oñate-OcañaSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elizabeth Ortiz-SánchezSubdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando 22, Colonia Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. elinfkb@yahoo.com.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-9855-9491
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Specific and thorough identification of cancer cell subsets with higher tumorigenicity and chemoresistance, such as cancer stem cells (CSCs), could lead to the development of new and promising therapeutic targets. For better CSC identification, a complete or extended surface marker phenotype is needed to provide increased specificity for new cell targeting approaches. Our goal is to identify and characterize a putative extended phenotype for CSCs derived from patients with GC before treatment, as well as to evaluate its clinical value. In addition, we aim to ensure that cells with this phenotype have stemness and self-renewal capabilities.

methodsThis is a cohort study including 127 treatment-naïve patients with GC who attended the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis was performed to determine the extended phenotype of cells derived from gastric biopsies. The tumorigenic capability of cells identified in patients was assessed in a zebrafish model.

resultsCD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells were present in all treatment-naïve patients included, with a median abundance of 1.16% (0.57-1.89%). The percentage of CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells was categorized as high or low using 1.19% as the cutoff for the CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cell subset. Additionally, a higher TNM stage correlated with a higher percentage of CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells (Rho coefficient 0.369; p < 0.0001). We also demonstrated that a higher percentage of CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells was positively associated with metastasis. The metastatic potential of these cells was confirmed in a zebrafish model. Ultimately, under our conditions, we conclude that CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells are true gastric cancer stem cells (GCSCs).

conclusionThe CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells present in tissue samples from patients are true GCSCs. This extended phenotype results in better and more specific characterization of these highly tumorigenic cells. The relative quantification of CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ cells has potential clinical value, as these cells are associated with metastatic disease, making their presence an additional prognostic marker and possibly a target for the design of new antineoplastic treatments in the era of precision oncology. Overall, the extended CD24+CD44+CD54+EpCAM+ phenotype of GCSCs could support their isolation for the study of their stemness mechanisms, leading to the identification of better molecular targets for the development of both new therapeutic approaches such as oncoimmunotherapy and new diagnostic and clinical prognostic strategies for GC.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsZebrafishAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Neoplastic Stem CellsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanCD44 protein, humanEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeHyaluronan ReceptorsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Cancer stem cellsGastric cancerImmunophenotypeMetastasisXenotransplantsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36737794
PMCPMC9898964
OpenAlexW4319079004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.