Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737768›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Daoan Cheng, Weiqing Zhao, Rui Chen, Dong Li, Shuxian Tang, Cheng Fang, Mei Ji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daoan Cheng *Departments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
Weiqing Zhao *Departments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
Rui Chen *Departments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
Dong LiDepartments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
Shuxian TangDepartments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China.
Cheng FangDepartments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China. fangcheng@suda.edu.cn.
Mei JiDepartments of Oncology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213004, China. jimei_97@126.com.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy because of the intolerable adverse effects in China. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery has become an emerging treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. There was still no consensus on whether nICT was superior to nCT alone in patients with esophageal cancer.

methodsIn this retrospective study, patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received surgery after nICT (n=26, 40%) or nCT alone (n=39, 60%) were included. The patients were classified as nICT or nCT arm. The primary endpoints were pathological tumor response (PTR) and event-free survival (EFS). The different clinic-pathological features were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square (χ

resultsThree (11.5%) of the 26 patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) in the nICT group, and four (10.3%) of the 39 patients achieved pCR in the nCT group, respectively (P=1.000). Six (23.1%) of the 26 patients achieved major pathological response (MPR) in the nICT group, and 11 (28.2%) of the 39 patients achieved MPR in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.645). Downstaging was achieved in 13 (44.8%) patients in the nICT group and 16 (55.2%) patients in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.732). To verify the tumor regression grade (TRG) results, we compared them with MPR and pCR, which showed a significant dependency (P< 0.001). Patients who achieved downgrading showed better MPR and pCR rates (P<0.001 and P =0.010). There was no significant difference in EFS between the nICT and nCT groups (HR=1.011, 95% CI: 0.421-2.425, P = 0.981).

conclusionsNeoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, more studies with long-term follow-up were needed to confirm this result.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRetrospective StudiesPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)Esophageal cancerImmunochemotherapyNeoadjuvant treatment

Identifiers

PMID36737768
PMCPMC9896760
OpenAlexW4319080343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.