ArticleBMC palliative care2023
Impact of a machine learning algorithm on time to palliative care in a primary care population: protocol for a stepped-wedge pragmatic randomized trial.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04604457 (Impact of Predictive Modeling on Time to Palliative Care in an Outpatient Primary Care Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Predictive Modeling on Time to Palliative Care in an Outpatient Primary Care Population
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reporting Quality of AI Intervention in Randomized Controlled Trials in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Relational-temporal dignity at the end of life: Ethical foundations for the DiRePal model in the algorithmic age.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- A primer on artificial intelligence for palliative care educators.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- Ethical Challenges and Opportunities of AI in End-of-Life Palliative Care: Integrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Implementing a transmural model of early palliative care in advanced dementia: the use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Assessing Artificial Intelligence Solution Effectiveness: The Role of Pragmatic Trials.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm to Identify Palliative Care Needs in a Primary Care Population: A Pilot Study.Palliative medicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs primary care populations age, timely identification of palliative care need is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies have targeted particular patient populations with life-limiting disease, but few have focused on patients in a primary care setting. Toward this end, we propose a stepped-wedge pragmatic randomized trial whereby a machine learning algorithm identifies patients empaneled to primary care units at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota, United States) with high likelihood of palliative care need.
methods42 care team units in 9 clusters were randomized to 7 wedges, each lasting 42 days. For care teams in treatment wedges, palliative care specialists review identified patients, making recommendations to primary care providers when appropriate. Care teams in control wedges receive palliative care under the standard of care. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial therefore integrates machine learning into clinical decision making, instead of simply reporting theoretical predictive performance. Such integration has the possibility to decrease time to palliative care, improving patient quality of life and symptom burden.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04604457 , restrospectively registered 10/26/2020. PROTOCOL: v0.5, dated 9/23/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.