Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737713›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis.

Bing Wang, Yongjie Ye, Long Yao, Ancheng Wei, Xin Huang, Zhiqiang Wang, Xiaojun Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bing Wang *Orthopedic, Suining Central Hospital, No.127, Desheng West Road, Suining, 629000, People's Republic of China.
Yongjie Ye *Orthopedic, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, NO.33, Mashi Street, Chengdu, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Long YaoChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Chengdu, 610075, People's Republic of China.
Ancheng WeiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Chengdu, 610075, People's Republic of China.
Xin HuangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1166, Liutai Avenue, Chengdu, 610075, People's Republic of China.
Zhiqiang Wang *Orthopedic, Suining Central Hospital, No.127, Desheng West Road, Suining, 629000, People's Republic of China. 38262773@qq.com.
Xiaojun Yu *Orthopedic, Suining Central Hospital, No.127, Desheng West Road, Suining, 629000, People's Republic of China. yuxiaojun2024@163.com.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSuizhou Central Hospital · CNChengdu Fifth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Annual "Xing lin Scholars" Talent Research Promotion Program of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine YYZX2020089Youth Innovation Project of Medical Research of Sichuan Medical Association Q19051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the "critical corner" that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee.

methodsCT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia.

resultsAmong the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60° and 90°). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13.

conclusionIn summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint.

Indexed as

Posterior Cruciate LigamentPosterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultCadaverFemurFinite Element AnalysisHumansKnee JointMaleTibiaBiomechanicsCritical cornerFinite elementKnee joint injuryPosterior cruciate ligamentReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36737713
PMCPMC9898916
OpenAlexW4319215967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.