ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2023
Use of clinical scores in young Australian adults for prediction of atherosclerosis in middle age.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We sought to apply a simple cardiovascular health tool not requiring laboratory tests (the Fuster-BEWAT score, FBS) to predict subclinical atherosclerosis. This study included 2657 young adults (< 40 years of age). In the prognostic group (n = 894, followed for 13 years until aged 40-50 years at follow-up), the primary outcome was presence of carotid plaque measured by carotid ultrasound at follow-up. Of these 894 participants, 86 (9.6%) had unilateral, and 23 participants (2.6%) had bilateral, carotid plaques at follow-up. The baseline FBS was predictive of carotid plaque at follow-up [odds ratio OR = 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) per 1-SD increase in FBS], similar to prediction from Pooled Cohort Equation [PCE, OR = 0.72 (0.61-0.85) per 1-SD decrease in PCE]. Risk scores at baseline predicted outcomes more strongly than those at follow-up, and did so independently of any changes over 13 years of follow-up. Similar discrimination for predicting carotid plaque after 13 years was found for both baseline FBS [C-statistic = 0.68 (95% CI 0.62-0.74)] and PCE [C-statistic = 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.75)]. Application of this FBS prognostic information to a contemporary cohort of 1763 young adults anticipates the future development of plaque in 305 (17.3%), especially in the 1494 participants (85%) with ≤ 2 metrics of ideal health. In conclusions, FBS measured in young adulthood predicted atherosclerosis 13 years later in middle age, independent of score changes over the follow-up period, emphasizing the importance of early damage to vascular health. FBS may be a simple and feasible risk score for engaging low-risk young people with reduction of future cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.