Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737683›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2023

Psychosocial changes during COVID-19 lockdown on nursing home residents, their relatives and clinical staff: a prospective observational study.

Adriana Catarina De Souza Oliveira, María Gómez Gallego, Carmelo Gómez Martínez, Elena Carrasco Martínez, Jorge Moreno Molina, Juan José Hernández Morante, Paloma Echevarría Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana Catarina De Souza OliveiraResearch Group of Nursing Languages in Social Context, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain.
María Gómez GallegoDepartment of Neurology and Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Carmelo Gómez MartínezResearch Group of Nursing Languages in Social Context, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain.
Elena Carrasco MartínezResearch Group of Nursing Languages in Social Context, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain.
Jorge Moreno Molina"Mensajeros de La Paz" Nursing Home Association, Murcia, Spain.
Juan José Hernández MoranteResearch Group of Nursing Languages in Social Context, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain. jjhernandez@ucam.edu.
Paloma Echevarría PérezResearch Group of Nursing Languages in Social Context, Faculty of Nursing, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain.
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESConsejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León · ES

Funding

UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia PMAFI-COVID19/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious works have observed an increase of depression and other psychological disorders on nursing home residents as a consequence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown; however, there are few studies that have performed a comprehensive evaluation of all people involved in nursing homes environment. The objective of the work was to analyse the impact of lockdown on psychosocial factors of nursing home residents, relatives and clinical staff and how these variables have influenced residents' survival.

methodsA prospective study was designed. Evaluations were performed at three different times: a) at the beginning of Spanish confinement, in March 2020; b) just before the second wave of the pandemic, with relaxation of security measures but in lockdown, and c) in January-February 2021, at the end of the second wave, when visits were already allowed. The study was conducted on three different nursing homes. Three hundred and one residents, 119 clinical staff and 51 relatives took part in the study. Anxiety and depression were evaluated in all participants. A scale on the meaning of suffering was also performed. In addition, burnout status was also determined in the clinical staff.

resultsAll participants showed lower depression during lockdown, while at the beginning and at the end of the confinement, these values were significantly increased. In residents, these changes were dependent of cognitive status (p = 0.012). Anxiety was significantly higher in residents. The evolution of anxiety was similar than with depression, with lower values during confinement, although clinical staff showed higher anxiety levels at the beginning. The feeling of suffering was significantly lower in the clinical staff than in resident and relative groups. Residents' survival was dependent of cognitive status (p = 0.018) and voluntary confinement (p < 0.001).

conclusionsDuring the first COVID-19 lockdown, psychological wellbeing of residents cared in nursing homes, their relatives and staff did not seem to be seriously affected. Previous mental health in relatives and staff together with a resilient approach to the adversity might partly be protecting factors. The lack of consequences on residents' anxiety, depression and perception of social support may reflect the special attention and care they received. Finally, as in the current study only data of the first two COVID-19 waves were analysed, its findings might be partly generalized to all the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersCommunicable Disease ControlHumansNursing HomesProspective StudiesAnxietyDepressionHumanizationLockdownNursing homeRelativesSocial supportStaff

Identifiers

PMID36737683
PMCPMC9897885
OpenAlexW4319069341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.